http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com http://blogcopy.com http://blogcopy.com/int/fpix.php?bd=xl8 en-us Sat, 25 May 2013 09:21:36 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=1w6byk8 Mon, 20 May 2013 01:31:51 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=1w6byk8 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=ik571t Sun, 19 May 2013 11:00:13 +0000


by David Alan Paty





Roşia Montană, in the Judeţul Alba, Romania (Wikipedia)

In the heart of Transylvania, in the Apuseni Mountains of western Romania, an idyllic village sits in a valley of unparalleled beauty and quiet defiance.

In this village, every stone, every trail under a blossoming apple tree speaks of the joy of life where people share in nature's seasonal abundance; it is a paradise on earth.

But there is also a shadow lurking; a dark force that threatens to alter and destroy two-thousand years of history and an environment that has stood for millenniums.

This dark force has many names; ignorance, greed, self-absorption and fear but its goal is always the same - to blind people to the truth, that happiness can be found only in selfless service to one another.

For most of its two-thousand year history, Rosia Montana has been a village where families lived in relative harmony with the earth.

Mining for gold in miles of underground tunnels and shafts, they also took wood from the abundant forests and harvested fields of chicory and garlic, red beets and rhubarb, without destroying its ability to regenerate and renew.

They understood that the land offered them life and it was their duty to protect the natural resources of the area not only for their generation but for all the generations that would follow. The land was their heritage, it defined them as a people. Rosia Montana was who they were.

But the passing centuries brought more advanced technology; men were able to extract tiny amounts of gold, invisible to the eye, from the soil. Large, international companies began to scour the earth for gold hiding in distant lands.

Eventually, they discovered Romania's hidden treasure in the place where gold had always been; Rosia Montana.

At first, the people of Rosia Montana said "No! Go away! Go back to your homes across the sea!" but the men from beyond the ocean knew what would make the people forget their traditions, their culture and their heritage.

They showed the people bags of money and told them to forget the land that was in their blood, the land of their fathers and grandfathers.

Many people listened to the company's lies and took the money to spend on cars and big-screen TVs and a bigger house.They forgot their community and watched as the birthplace of their people was destroyed house by house, family by family.

They sacrificed their community, their neighbors, their friends and bowed down to the greed of a foreign company lusting to take the gold from the earth, gold that belonged to the land and to all of Romania.

Rosia Montana reminds people of their heritage, not only for those who once called Rosia Montana home, not only for all Romanians but for the whole world; for Rosia Montana represents the best of the human spirit.

It's a flame that speaks of living in harmony with nature and with each other; a flame of yearning that burns in all of our hearts, a flame that should never be extinguished.

The Rosia Montana Cultural Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting and preserving the cultural and natural patrimony of Rosia Montana, Romania.

Threatened with the largest open pit gold mining operation in Europe, Rosia Montana needs your support in ending government corruption and the gold corporation's misinformation. Please visit us at http://www.rosia-montana-cultural-foundation.com/heritage/.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Alan_Paty

http://EzineArticles.com/?Rosia-Montana:-A-Paradise-in-Jeopardy&id=7690162]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=ik571t http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2cpchuj Thu, 16 May 2013 23:02:10 +0000 large number of exotic poisons]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2cpchuj http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=46umicr Wed, 15 May 2013 11:35:48 +0000
Fifty years ago there were no bags on this planet. Now consider based on their break down rate that every bag ever manufactured, except for the recycled or incinerated ones are either filling our landfills, polluting our waterways or hanging in our kitchen closets as clutter.

Often comforts of everyday life, things we now consider a necessity were developed and pushed into our lives only because they were the cheapest option. Long-term costs, such as the impact on our environment and the clean up of it weren't considered. This appears to be the case with plastic bags.

Dependence on Foreign Oil

Plastic bags are manufactured using polyethylene a byproduct of oil. Roughly 60 to 100 million barrels of oil go into their production each year. China recently banned the use of plastic bags and their estimated savings in oil was about 37 million barrels per year.

They Take a Very, Very Long Time to Break Down

Plastic bags haven't been around for long, less than fifty years. So no one knows for sure how long they take to break down. One thing is for sure though; all the plastic bags that haven't been recycled or incinerated are still on this planet in landfills, floating in the ocean, littering our parks, roadways and lakes, or just piled in corners of our closets, garages or kitchens.

Grocery bags are made from polyethylene and are photodegradable and not biodegradable. Being photodegradable means, these bags need sunlight to break down. Therefore, burying them in a landfill accomplishes nothing other than to hide the problem and create mountains of trash buried out of sight.

When and if they do degrade, they simply break down into smaller more toxic microscopic particles called petrol-polymers that seep into waterways and eventually enter our food chain.

Plastic Bags Account for 10% of Debris Washed Up On Our Shoreline

They have been seen floating in the oceans, and washing up on shorelines as far North as the Arctic Circle and as far south as The Falkland Islands. What an awful eyesore to our planet as a whole.

Kill Hundreds of Thousands of Animals Per Year

Believing the bags to be food, marine wildlife choke on the bags and die or they enter their digestive systems until they die. After death their bodies decompose, but not the bags.

Plastic bags are cheap, efficient and strong. They make shopping simple and easy. However plastic bags have many negative effects on the environment. They increase our dependence on foreign oil, pollute our waterways, fill our landfills, kill our wildlife and are an eyesore.

Greg Johnson writes on a variety of subjects, including the environment, tips for going green, and alternative energy sources. Greg is passionate about the environment and believes we as a society as a whole are depleting and destroying our environment to fast. Get more Green Tips at: http://www.bestgogreentips]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=46umicr http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=39rsqiw Tue, 14 May 2013 22:49:20 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=39rsqiw http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=1fmaujo Tue, 14 May 2013 22:47:42 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=1fmaujo http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=z2vbyd Tue, 14 May 2013 14:32:59 +0000 be about 13 million hectares. But according to the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP), Africa is suffering deforestation at twice the world
rate.The stats couldn't be more alarming - almost 90 percent of original
rainforests in West Africa have been wiped out, and the landscapes left behind
are heavily fragmented and in extremely poor condition.About 80 percent
of the rural population in sub-Saharan Africa is heavily dependent on timber for
fuel, so not surprisingly illegal logging, along with conversion of timberland
for agricultural purposes, has proven to be a major culprit in this wholesale
deforestation.Although there are initiatives aimed at preserving the
rainforest areas in the region, investments are not nearly as adequate as they
need to be to outweigh forestry losses.It takes seven to 10 tons of raw
wood to produce one ton of wood charcoal. If African households continue to meet
their needs by burning fuel wood, the outlook is grim - by 2050, rural
households will have sent 6.7 billion tons of greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere.In addition, the International Energy Agency (IEA) claims
that under a business-as-usual scenario, three-quarters of total residential
energy in sub-Saharan Africa would come from biomass. This leaves the region in
an urgent need for investments in an alternative biomass source that will
replace wood."Bamboo charcoal could provide an excellent alternative to
hardwood charcoal production as bamboo biomass production is much greater and
considerably more sustainable," claims Terry Sunderland, scientist with the
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). And she couldn't be more on
target.Bamboo is one of the fastest-growing plants on the planet. It
produces large amounts of biomass, which makes it an excellent alternative and
sustainable source of energy. Bamboo charcoal is an environmentally friendly
material that has excellent absorption properties.]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=z2vbyd http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=1w5ky78 Tue, 14 May 2013 09:51:05 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=1w5ky78 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2coyf1j Tue, 14 May 2013 09:50:17 +0000 stinking mounds of rotting garbage. They are typically thought of as necessary
evils. While it is true that recycling and reducing waste is important to the
future of our planet, the evils of landfills can be mitigated by using them to
provide energy. While this doesn't eliminate waste, it at least puts waste to
good use.In a landfill trash is typically buried. Many modern landfills
are lined to prevent wastes from seeping to the groundwater and polluting it.
Organic materials in the buried garbage are broken down by a process known as
anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic means "without oxygen". Since the trash is
buried, oxygen cannot easily reach it. As a result, bacteria that can metabolize
organic materials without oxygen digest it. One of the by products of this
process is landfill gas. Landfill gas is composed of over 50%
methane.Methane gas is also known as swamp gas because of its bad odor.
Methane escaping from the ground is the major cause of bad odor associated with
landfills. This escaping methane is also dangerous to our environment. Methane
is a very potent greenhouse gas. It is a much stronger contributor to global
warming than carbon dioxide. Fortunately, methane can also be useful. The
natural gas that we use to generate electricity and to heat our homes is
composed mostly of methane.Landfill gas recovery, is a process of
capturing the gas generated by anaerobic digestion. This gas is captured to
be used or to simply be burned in order to prevent the methane from contributing
to global warming. The process for capturing the landfill gas is very similar to
the process for capturing natural gas from the earth. A well is drilled into the
landfill and pipes are inserted to capture and direct the gas.The
captured landfill gas contains a great deal of water as well as numerous sulfur
compounds. These need to be removed if the gas is going to be used to provide
energy. The water reduces the efficiency of the gas for creating energy. The
sulfur compounds can contribute to smog and pollution when the gas is burned.
Once these are removed, the landfill gas can be used to generate
electricity.There are a number of ways in which landfill gas can be used
to generate electricity. One common method is to burn the gas to heat water. The
heated water is then used to drive the turbines for generating electricity.
Another method is to use it in place of natural gas. In Ohio, several Rumpke landfills use
landfill gas recovery systems to capture, treat and then sell the gas to Duke
Energy. Duke Energy then pipes this gas to its natural gas
users.Landfills can be a danger to our environment but in many ways they
are necessary evils. By using landfill gas recovery, landfills
can help contribute to our world's energy needs while keeping dangerous
greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere. In many ways, this makes landfills
necessary but maybe just a little less evil.John Z. Franklin is a
graduate Colorado State University were he earned a degree in Environmental
Science. He also earned his JD at Harvard Law School. He is a freelance writer
interested in educating the public about the many simple energy and easy to
adopt energy efficiency behaviors. Mr. Franklin is a co-owner of Air and Gas
Systems]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2coyf1j http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2t7qvrl Thu, 09 May 2013 16:18:33 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2t7qvrl http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=3qa5cwg Mon, 06 May 2013 23:28:06 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=3qa5cwg http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=39qrvxe Mon, 06 May 2013 23:27:28 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=39qrvxe http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2t6tib3 Thu, 02 May 2013 05:50:34 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2t6tib3 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2cnc891 Wed, 01 May 2013 08:41:07 +0000
1. Travelling from a home in a suburb to a job in the city by automobile. The city planners who came up with the idea of suburban living while working way over in the crowded, congested city have to get the medal for the worst possible non-visionary thinking in the history of modern humanity. Short-sightedness doesn't even begin to excuse this practice that not only burns a non-renewable fuel, contributes to air pollution as well as takes away from the quality of life from those unfortunate folks that have to spend hours stuck in traffic. The good news is that more and more companies are speeding up their efforts to create telecommuting and 20 somethings have decided that living in the city where the work is makes more sense.

2. The creation of "Roundup Ready" genetically modified seeds. This unsustainable practice seems more like something that came from a bad science fiction B movie, but most folks don't even know it's happening. Monsanto, the mother of genetically modified plant biology, created something called "Roundup Ready" crops. Instead of spraying the herbicide Roundup to kill weeds that would hurt crops, farmer now only need get genetically engineered seeds from Monsanto that permit direct application of the Monsanto herbicide glyphosate.

This allows farmers to smother both their crops and crop land with the herbicide so as to be able to kill nearby weeds without killing the crops. Not only is it insane to have seeds that have herbicides built into them for consumers to ingest, but this practice has created the super weed, thus strengthening the very thing it is supposed to stop. I won't even talk about the $250 million extra income boost this practice gave to Monsanto.

3. The war on drugs. 40 years and over a trillion dollars later, the war on drugs is not only an utter failure, it is a national scandal. Why has it not worked? It's having the opposite effect of what it was supposedly designed to do. It has empowered drug cartels because of the money involved, illicit drug availability is more readily available now than ever and at a time when most nations are struggling with debts and calls for austerity, we're throwing money down the proverbial drain and nothing to show for it. I want to make it clear that this analysis is not a call for the legalization of drugs, but a re-evaluation of something that is unsustainable. There's gotta be a better way.

4. Modern day mortgages. Let's say you decide to buy a $500,000 home with $100,000 saved for the down payment or deposit. Check the key numbers:

Home price = $500,000
Deposit / down payment = $100,000
Loan = $400,000
Interest rate = 5%
Loan period = 30 years

Got a loan calculator? Got an adult beverage? Plug these numbers, take that drink, then check these number. You won't believe the following:

Monthly repayments (interest and principal) = $1,666.66
Total interest payable over 30 years = $600,000
Total amount payable over 30 years = $1,000,000

Under any other name, this would be called predatory or loan sharking. Buying a home under the modern bank loan conditions means that buying a home is not an investment, but a robbery. The current mortgage crisis means that the system, even for qualified buyers, is unsustainable.

5. Consumerism. Has any of that stuff you bought really made you happy? Or did it make you just want something else to fill in the gap? Don't be surprised. That's how it was designed. Consumerism is a social and economic order in many Western cultures that is based on the systematic creation and fostering of a desire to purchase goods and services in ever greater amounts. To be fair, consumerism happens around the world and is as old as Egyptian civilization. But when the Industrial Revolution exploded in Western societies, it turned the idea of living to consume items into a crack habit.

Advertising, mass production and efficient delivery systems made Consumerism a way of life, 24/7. The problem is that this level of consumption is requiring people to work 2 or 3 jobs today just to obtain some of the same stuff people bought just a few years ago. There is a reason there is great dissatisfaction in life and living. Consumerism is truly another form of addiction. As with all addictions, the addict will crash at some point.

For a long time, we've assigned the discussion of Sustainability over to Birkenstock-wearing tree huggers from California or Oregon. Now we're starting to reclaim Sustainability as just plain common sense. Some things we've done out of ignorance. On these 5 items, we can no longer use that excuse.

By Chet W. Sisk

Chet W. Sisk is an author, Life Coach, Sustainable Society Leadership educator and thought leader. His new book "Think This - Not That" challenges conventional wisdom that guides our society.

http://www.chetsisk.com.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Chet_Sisk
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-5-Worst-Unsustainable-Practices-In-Society&id=5826505]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=2cnc891 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=3q9exzy Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:02:28 +0000 Capturing the energy of waves in the ocean is a very old idea but only
recently has it been possible with any amount of success.
The first thing you need to understand is the difference between wave power
and tidal power. Waves are created by wind blowing across the surface of the
water. Higher winds means bigger waves naturally. However, tides are created by
the gravity of the moon and sun interacting on the oceans causing bulging. This
bulging rotates the earth with the moon and that is why there are high and low
tides. Tides remain more or less the same in terms of energy and intensity.
The first and only commercially-used technology for wave energy is the
Pelamis machine. These snake-like tubes float along the surface to the water
moving with the waves. This movement is resisted internally by hydraulic pumps
that move a hydraulic fluid through a hydraulic motor. This motor is connected
to an electrical generator and from there to batteries which will hold the
energy generated.
Other ideas exist such as energy buoys which would be anchored to the ocean
floor and bob with the waves thus generating electricity. However, this has less
testing and commercial use than the traditional Pelamis machines. The technology
is catching up though and we might see these energy buoys off our own shores.

There is also an idea to create barricades on shores where waves break
directly at the shore. These breaking waves would force water up into the
barricades powering turbines. However, this idea hasn't moved beyond simply
theoretical so far. It is one of the more promising technologies though.
For more information on renewable energy check out my site called renewable
energy future. Also, there is a more detailed article on wave power explained.
Hope you enjoyed this lesson.]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=3q9exzy http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=46sserr Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:00:23 +0000 and tidal power. Waves are created by wind blowing across the surface of the
water. Higher winds means bigger waves naturally. However, tides are created by
the gravity of the moon and sun interacting on the oceans causing bulging. This
bulging rotates the earth with the moon and that is why there are high and low
tides. Tides remain more or less the same in terms of energy and intensity.
The first and only commercially-used technology for wave energy is the
Pelamis machine. These snake-like tubes float along the surface to the water
moving with the waves. This movement is resisted internally by hydraulic pumps
that move a hydraulic fluid through a hydraulic motor. This motor is connected
to an electrical generator and from there to batteries which will hold the
energy generated.
Other ideas exist such as energy buoys which would be anchored to the ocean
floor and bob with the waves thus generating electricity. However, this has less
testing and commercial use than the traditional Pelamis machines. The technology
is catching up though and we might see these energy buoys off our own shores.

There is also an idea to create barricades on shores where waves break
directly at the shore. These breaking waves would force water up into the
barricades powering turbines. However, this idea hasn't moved beyond simply
theoretical so far. It is one of the more promising technologies though.
For more information on renewable energy check out my site called renewable
energy future. Also, there is a more detailed article on wave power explained.
Hope you enjoyed this lesson.]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=46sserr http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=46sjsf9 Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:53:20 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=46sjsf9 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=ihk0tb Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:51:32 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=ihk0tb http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=39psubw Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:49:13 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=39psubw http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=z0r80v Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:52:20 +0000
CO2: Around 1900, Arvid Hgbom found that factories were emitting about the same amount of CO2 as all the world's volcanoes. This worried some people - but they were told not to worry, the plants and oceans would soon take up any excess. However, that has not been the case.

We have destroyed many of the forests that take up CO2. Our factories and other activities now are emitting thirty billion tons of CO2 each year, around 200 times as much CO2 as all the world's volcanoes. The CO2 dissolves in water to form carbonic acid, which has made the oceans 20% more acidic in the last century. This has damaged the coral and phytoplankton that take up CO2. Also, since CO2 is less soluble in the more acidic waters, the oceans are losing their ability to take up the excess CO2.

Measurements by Charles Keeling of atmospheric CO2 levels have shown that the plants and the oceans are not taking up the CO2 nearly as fast as we are producing it. The concentration of CO2 in the air has increased rapidly over the last century, from 280 parts per million (ppm) to 385 ppm, a 38% increase. It would seem that one bright spot might be that the higher CO2 level would be good for plant growth. However, that may not be the case.

Historical Data shows that the concentration of CO2 in the air has varied widely over the Earth's history, from over 7000 ppm in the Paleozoic era to a low of 180 ppm during ice ages. Ice core studies show that during the last four ice ages, the CO2 concentration was about 180 ppm during the cold periods and rose to about 280 ppm during the warmer interglacial periods. Warmer temperatures occur at the same times as the higher CO2 levels, so it is difficult to sort out the effect on plants caused by CO2 changes from those caused by temperature changes. Ancient plants that grew at higher temperatures and CO2 levels during the Paleozoic Era adapted to the drop in CO2 level and temperatures near the end of that era by developing leaves.

Ancient leaved species, such as Ginko and Magnolia, when exposed to higher levels of CO2, change their leaf structures. Other plants have adapted by changing the altitude at which they grow. For the last 6000 years, we have been in an interglacial period. The Earth's temperature has been relatively stable and the CO2 concentration has been about 280 ppm, except for the last century.

Plant Growth: According to Dr. Surendra Singh, a biologist with a background in botany, modern plants have adapted to the 280 million ppm CO2 concentration that has existed over the last thousands of years. There is no reason to believe that the increasing CO2 concentration would be better for plants as CO2 is seldom the limiting agent in plant growth and production. Plants also require water, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, sunlight, and trace elements. Over-fertilizing, over-watering, or putting a shade plant in bright sun will harm the plant. More is not always better, and the increasing the CO2 levels might also harm plants that are not adapted to higher CO2 levels.

Greenhouses: Commercial greenhouses have found that adding CO2 helps plants grow better. Some people claim that that proves CO2 stimulates plant growth, but that is not necessarily true. In an enclosed greenhouse, the plants quickly deplete the supply of CO2 if more is not made available. That may also be the case with hydroponic gardeners, who claim better production at higher CO2 levels. Specific crops may do better at the higher levels of CO2 - if all the other nutrients are supplied at an optimum level and plenty of water is available. That is not possible for plants in the outdoors. We do fertilize many crops, but doing so depletes the soil of other nutrients and there is an energy cost in producing and spreading the fertilizers.

Experiments: It is difficult to do outdoor experiments on the effect of CO2 levels on crop growth, but a few have been done. One experiment found that wheat grown at higher CO2 levels has more leaf mass and more kernels; however, the kernels are smaller and have less nitrogen, making them less valuable as a food source.

In another experiment, higher CO2 levels in wheat used for grazing correlated with lower nitrogen in the leaves, making the crop less suitable for grazing. Agriculture experts are saying that the result of increasing CO2 levels coupled with increasing temperatures will lower crop yields. That has been found to be true in rice production, and rice is a staple for half the world. In an inadvertent experiment, we have found that some invasive species, such as Kudzu, are well adapted to the increasing temperatures and CO2 levels. They have prospered and are expanding their range northward.

Certainly, plants need CO2, but to say more CO2 will make all plants grow better is a great supposition and oversimplification. The Earth's atmospheric CO2 level is now 385 ppm, possibly higher than it has been in the last 20 million years, and it is increasing every year. By pouring more CO2 into the air each year, we are conducting a great experiment with unknown results. What will happen if the production from agricultural plants decreases significantly?]]> http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=z0r80v http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=igbt7t Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:17:19 +0000 http://blogcopy.com/~thezeitgeistischanging.blogspot.com?copy=igbt7t